Yellow Bullet Forums banner
1,301 - 1,320 of 6,064 Posts
Point out who these "less religious" countries are please.
He's talking about countries like, Sweden, population 10.35 million, Finland, pop 5.531 million, and Norway, pop 5.379 million. I gave population numbers because compare that to the US, lets use the state of California, pop 39.35 million.
You think there might be a problem with over crowding and funding? Let alone students and teachers not giving a shit?
Its all because of religion.....smfh.....
 
LOL...So now there is evidence that there is no God??? You'd think that would be news worthy...You are coming very close to being as kooky sounding as the extreme bible thumpers.
Why do believers continually attempt to wage ridiculous, unrealistic arguments?!? Did your mother drop you on your head as a child? You seem to be partially paralyzed from the neck up?:LOL::p

Either something exists and there is evidence for it, or it doesn’t and there isn’t any evidence for it. Since there is no actual evidence of a God existing, besides unsupported claims and stories, that’s where the discussion should end. At least until actual evidence is made available.

There is literally the exact same evidence of Dracula existing as there is for God existing. So I’ll ask again, can you provide actual evidence that Dracula does not, or did not, exist? If you can’t, then I should assume you believe he does exist, since that’s the standard you’ve set for yourself, right?
 
Your problem is you only accept the science that you want to.
Wrong, I’ll accept science of any kind. The problem is that believers have no understanding as to what science is. If creationists give something a name that sounds scientific, believers think it’s actually science. Hence the Discovery Institute, Intelligent Design, the Geoscience Institute, etc, etc.
 
Wrong, I’ll accept science of any kind. The problem is that believers have no understanding as to what science is. If creationists give something a name that sounds scientific, believers think it’s actually science. Hence the Discovery Institute, Intelligent Design, the Geoscience Institute, etc, etc.
Do you not think there are scientists that work at those placed that have science degrees?
 
Do you not think there are scientists that work at those placed that have science degrees?
Yes, but that’s usually where their contribution to science ends. They make faulty claims, do bogus experiments and present flawed conclusions. For example, please name all of the science journals, or publications, Steve A Austin’s paper was published in. After that, name all of the scientists that peer reviewed his paper and agreed with it.

When I Google that topic, the majority of the links were to The Institute for Creation, Steve A Austin, the Geoscience institute and Answers in Genesis. That paints a pretty clear picture. I did not click on the links for Answers in Genesis, but I would be genuinely surprised if they didn’t refer to Steve’s article. That’s because it is something that appears to be scientific, but it actually isn’t. But people that go looking for “science” in Answer in Genesis, probably don’t know anything about science. There seems to be some sort of “theme” here, no?
 
Either something exists and there is evidence for it, or it doesn’t and there isn’t any evidence for it. Since there is no actual evidence of a God existing, besides unsupported claims and stories, that’s where the discussion should end. At least until actual evidence is made available.
So, since there is no concrete scientific evidence as to how everything started,...how all life, the entire universe, the universe that spans further than at all possible to see,.....since there is nothing but theories behind how it all started, and no one knows for sure,.....should that discussion end as well, until actual evidence of what happened, and how it all began is made available. Just asking for a friend.
 
To be honest, I was brought up to believe, taught a religion, and a lot of it stuck with me. I'm the first one to admit, once I was old enough to question and doubt parts of what I was taught, I did,...and I do not believe all that was written and preached. They say the bible is to be interpreted by all who read it in different ways, on your own level. I feel, like many others, that it at least gives me hope of a better place than where we are today, a reward for being a good person, and an everlasting life compared to one here filled with sickness and death and destruction. Also, I am a believer in science. It is very interesting to me, I am a believer in archeology, and ancient history, and very interested in the vast universe and the theory of evolution,.....it is wonderous, and amazing. I love reading about new discoveries, here on Earth as well. And part of me understands that the greatest minds on Earth, can not pin point how it all began. There are theories, like the big bang, but there are just as many questions about where did the elements that participated in the big bang come from?....that absence of an explanation about how things in general came to be....keeps the "God created everything" thought going. And I know, I'm intelligent to know that the next question is "But where did God come from?" I can't answer that, just like brilliant scientists can't explain with certainty where life started.
Why do believers say that they believe in science, and then post something like this that displays they know nothing about science?

There is not a “theory” about a big bang. There is the Big Bang Theory. Do you understand the difference between those two things? Or are you just pretending to understand and accept science?
 
So, since there is no concrete scientific evidence as to how everything started,...how all life, the entire universe, the universe that spans further than at all possible to see,.....since there is nothing but theories behind how it all started, and no one knows for sure,.....should that discussion end as well, until actual evidence of what happened, and how it all began is made available. Just asking for a friend.
Address the post below this post I’m quoting, then we can proceed. You skipped it earlier.
 
Semantics
Address the post below this post I’m quoting, then we can proceed. You skipped it earlier.
When did I skip it? I don't take orders as to when I need to answer anyone. Whether I can proceed with you is hardly an important issue....lol.
 
There is not a “theory” about a big bang. There is the Big Bang Theory.
Semantics. Is it a theory or is it not? Any actual proof of what happened? Any undisputed proof that is exactly how all life began? Then it's a theory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tempname
1,301 - 1,320 of 6,064 Posts