Yellow Bullet Forums banner

BBC Oil Pressure

1 reading
17K views 34 replies 18 participants last post by  makinchips  
#1 ·
I have a Gen IV BBC. The oil pressure has been on the lower side ever since I've been using a BBC. My first block was a Gen VI, I roached the bottom end, trashed the block. I got a new block, new pump, all of it. So far I've had to rebuild my bottom end each year. I have always used SBC's, and never in my time racing have I ever had an issue like this. I've tried a different pump, pickup's, pan's, windage trays, and oil weights. I've been using Melling pumps, which I've always seemed to have no issues with. I just purchased a high pressure spring, but haven't put it in yet. I had 10W40 Synthetic in it and after 4000 RPM, the pressure would hit 60psi, then fall off. I took some oil out, just to be sure it wasn't roping, but it continued. The other day I put straight 50 in it, and now it goes to 60 psi, and stays there even after passing 6000 rpm, which I left off the pedal. Normal driving is not a problem. I am probably missing something so simple it'll make me look like an idiot, but I really don't want to wipe out another rotating assy., and I don't want to buy a $5-600 pump. Any ideas please.....
 
#4 ·
You need to be more specific in part numbers and stuff. I ran a 540 with a Moroso 20403 pan and a Melling M77H pump, though it was not optimal, I never hurt anything. I DID see on the dyno that with that pan over 6500 it started to lose oil pressure probably from windage. But nothing drastic to the point of hurting parts.
 
#5 ·
I fought oil return problems until I ran a -10 line from the back of the heads down to the pan on both sides. At high RPM the pan would simply pump into the valve covers and in my case with AFR heads where the drain holes simply arent big enough it would load up the top end. 6500 RPM with a foot on the throttle I'd watch that gauge hit zero. Ive seen plenty of top name engine builders swear the BBC won't fill the valve covers up and suck the pan dry . They are full of crap. Restrictors or a drain line back to the pan.
 
#6 ·
I am using a M77HV pump. I did have a Milodon 7qt. Oil Pan, and the corresponding Pickup. I now have a Summit Oil Pan which is the same capacity and depth. I am using Brodix BB2 heads, and I do know oil will sit in the passenger head because it runs down the side of the motor when I take off the Valve Cover. I do have Oil Galley Restrictors. I am using a remote filter due to header clearance. It has -8 lines, and I have verified they are indeed flowing the correct direction. Also, the oil filter adapter on the block has no bypass, so I do not believe pressure loss can occur there. I have used this same filter remote and lines for years on my SBC's with no issue. I feel the BBC should be no different.
 
#8 ·
Hv pump is not your problem and you don’t want restrictors with a roller lifter. My last engine had 75 psi oil pressure to 7500 with a moroso 21049 pan hv pump and no restrictors. It won’t suck the pan dry. If you return the same amount of oil to the pan as it pumps you’ll be fine. If you’re not, that is not a reason to starve the engine of oil because it’s not returning fast enough.
 
#12 ·
You absolutely can suck the pan dry. Yes. It happens because the oil doesnt return fast enough and thats a whole different discussion but part of the problem is that too much oil is flowing to the top end. No BBC needs a high volume pump unless your bearing clearances are shot. Best case you are using a lot of HP blowing oil through the bypass. Worst case you evacuate your pan into the valve covers faster than it can drain back.
 
#14 ·
Another vote for drain backs from the heads, just simply because they help. BBC valvecovers can hold a LOT of oil. - I personally would not run an HV pump with only 7 qrts in the pan.

The thicker oil might be telling you something, but if the gauge you're reading it from is only an 1/8" line that most come with it won't respond well with the thicker oil; meaning there may still be pressure fluctuation there that it doesn't register. We went up to 1/4" feed line and saw a difference in what the gauge reads.
 
#15 ·
I must be doing it all wrong lol.
I use restrictors in my big m block, I use a hv oil pump and I have Isky bushing style lifters. I use a -4 oil pressure line, the engine has sufficient oil pressure at all rpm's and has been pretty reliable for quite some time now. I use Lucas 10w40 synthetic racing oil
Oil pressure is 70 ish @ rpm and 40 @ idle hot. I am using the Moroso 20412 pan and run 6 qts including the filter.
little afr roval port 565.
 
#21 · (Edited)
The -8 lines may definitely be an issue, Mercruiser uses a remote filter stock and they use -10, most dry sump and remote wet pumps use -12.

To me, .003-.0032 would be a tad loose for 10w40, would consider 15w40 or 20w50 there myself but I've always liked a bit thicker oil anyway.



Restrictors in a Dart block?? Not sure why when it's priority oiling, guessing you use the allen headed ones and put them in the front then?
 
#16 · (Edited)
Thanks for all the input so far. I am using a NAPA Gold filter, which is made by WIX. I looked up all of the flow rating for oil filters and it flowed with the best of them. My bearing clearances were ground to .003".0032". I also measured them before assembly.
I already have a 1/4" tube on my oil pressure gage, it's been on there since the 90's. I do realize the bearing clearance is a little tight for 50W, but I was checking to see if it changed much before pulling it out . If I take the restrictors out, will it not pump more oil to the top end through the valve train? Also I did state earlier, there is no bypass on my oil filter adapter on the block. I do know some people use -10 or -12 lines on the remote filters, that being said, would my -8's be a restriction?
 
#18 ·
Thanks for all the input so far. I am using a NAPA Gold filter, which is made by WIX. I looked up all of the flow rating for oil filters and it flowed with the best of them. My bearing clearances were ground to .003".0032". I also measured them before assembly.
I already have a 1/4" tube on my oil pressure gage, it's been on there since the 90's. I do realize the bearing clearance is a little tight for 50W, but I was checking to see if it changed much before pulling it out . If I take the restrictors out, will it not pump more oil to the top end through the valve train? Also I did state earlier, there is no bypass on my oil filter adapter on the block. I do know some people use -10 or -12 lines on the remote filters, that being said, would my -8's be a restriction?
How long are the lines......??

I'd say so, I'd be minimum -10 for sure and if they are reasonably long them -12.

what size restrictors you got in it....??
 
#17 ·
The new AFR heads are cast by Edelbrock. For some fucking reason they cast little bumps right in front of one of the drain back holes. On these little bumps they engraved AFR. On the head where the bump is to the rear of the head I have to suck out the oil with a syringe so I don't get oil all over when I pull the valve covers.
 
#19 ·
That and the drain back holes are much smaller than any of my other heads. A -10 drain back line completely solved my drain back problem. Funny thing is that in the AFR instructions they plainly state that you may need flow restrictors or the valve covers may fill up with oil and drain the pan.
 
#22 ·
Buddy you need a plumber!

If I am reading your last post correctly. You indicate you are running a remote filter with #8 line size!

EEKS I would never begin with anything less than #10AN and I always use #12AN size remote oil lines and a large HP6 type oil filter that can flow a lot of oil per minute with no bypass! Also make sure all your an fittings that change direction at 45 or 90 degree are radius bends not hard angle only fittings.

Remember oil flow is a product of volume and pressure and line size, pressure alone is not the only good measure of oil flow. This is one reason you are probably thrashing your bottom ends and such. You are not only getting pressure drop but you are restricting volume of oil in flow to necessary areas.

I would also recommend you install some windage control in the pan and under the crank to make sure you are not whipping up oil malts full of air and dropping pressure. Pumps, oil pressure springs, oil weights and restrictors do not alone make for good engine oiling!
 
#26 ·
I have a new Dart BBC block and new AFR 357 CNC heads. No oiling issues. 65# steady oil pressure at speed hot. 35# at idle hot. 9.30s at 142 MPH.

No restrictors in the block. Melling Select +25% high volume pump, Moroso Street/Strip G body oil pan and pick up. 3/8" pick up to pan clearance .0035" main bearing clearance. .0028" rod bearing clearance. Steel rods. .018" side clearance. Just basic bracket race stuff.

Built a few like this with no problems
 
#27 ·
9 seconds without any problems huh. Now try tooling down the road at 80-90 MPH at 4500 RPM for a a few miles and then stomp on it for a few minutes. Watch that oil pressure gauge hit zero. Then let off and see the gauge bounce a bit then nail it again and see it drop to zero again..

Its not a good feeling.
 
#33 · (Edited)
I think there is a confusion of terms here but its describing the same thing. HV pumps have been used forever and are still used today. There is the theory that HV pumps can pump a pan dry. Its not that the pump is pumping the pan dry. Oil is not returning fast enough to the pan. I will agree that an HV pump is NOT really necessary. A lot of engine builders get by with a standard volume pump and increase the pump pressure. However a pump will only pump the volume that the engine can leak out on its way to the last port. Meaning that all the restrictions and tight clearances in the engine dictate how much oil will flow. The tighter these restrictions are the more restriction to flow and the more drag the oil pump will put on the engine. This is the downside to an HV pump. When you can't return oil to the pan fast enough, it APPEARS the pump sucked the pan dry. When in reality, its the drains. You need to fix the drainback, not reduce oil flow. Now granted there is HP in windage losses so too much oil is not a good thing either, but cooling of components and long term reliability is more important to me than a few extra hp in a bracket engine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alaskaracer1$
This post has been deleted