Yellow Bullet Forums banner

The Holley 300-110 Intake Manifold

1 reading
15K views 44 replies 13 participants last post by  ChopperScott  
#1 ·
Hello there. This is a brand new Holley Keith Dorton 300-110 intake manifold for small block Chevy. I've read a lot of praise from reputable names, but never laid my hands on one before. I was intending to match and port, then try it on my small block with AFR 245NPP heads, or a future build with AFR 220 Comp heads. After examining port alignment, I've reconsidered. It will not work with my large port heads without fabrication including TIG welding and machining. I compared it to both AFR 6901 and Fel-Pro 1206 gaskets. I also bolted it onto the AFR 220's with the 6901 taped to the heads for reference.


Image
 
#7 ·
Will you move it on and try the new Trickflow that starts at 1206 already? Good to start with a product closer suited to application for us weekend guys

From Trickflow
“This intake manifold is only meant for use on high performance small block Chevrolet engines equipped with Trick Flow® 230cc heads, or comparable cylinder heads 220cc or larger that operate in the range of 3,500-7,500+ RPM.”
 
#8 ·
Will you move it on and try the new Trickflow that starts at 1206 already?
Lol. Yes, I will. I have no intention of touching the Holley. This thread is basically a tech bulletin. If the info was available beforehand, I would have passed on this manifold.
 
#13 · (Edited)
I know there are quite a few guys here on this forum who have intimate experience with this manifold. I'm sure many are preoccupied with PRI at the moment. I've got a few questions. Is the poor alignment of those runners and ports normal?
 
#17 ·
Not sure what the goal is by using intake gaskets as templates but the last set of small block Chevrolet heads I did, the intake ports on the heads were the pattern to port the intake to.

These DART 215 castings were done over ten years ago for a bracket 355 combination and were pretty stout back then. When doing the porting to the Holley 300-25 manifold, I didn't care what gasket was needed as they always were trimmed to fit the intake ports. Just get the manifold runners and cylinder head ports to match up was the priority.

Maybe I'm missing something with all these intake gasket sizings? :unsure:

Image

Image

Image

Image
 
#20 ·
Not sure what the goal is by using intake gaskets as templates
Maybe I'm missing something with all these intake gasket sizings? :unsure:
Tape on. Tape off. Gasket is taped to head, manifold is bolted down. Transfer tape to manifold and remove with gasket. I did this to show the position of the ports relative to the gasket on a variety of manifolds. The ports on the 300-100 are clearly out of position. It’s also the only manifold that won’t work as cast.
 
#19 ·
OP, just looks like the Holley had too much material taken off the head side of the intake during mfg. A .120" thick trim to fit gasket should take care of the issue. IMO, I would start off with a bigger intake for an AFR 245 head and large cubic inch SBC. Less porting work.

Ed, nice work!

Jason G.
 
#22 ·
I’d like to do an on-track manifold comparison using my car as the drag mule. I’m looking to crown a top contender on a pump gas, 434 small block Chevy running up to 7500 rpm.
That Holley was a disappointment right out-of-the-box
 
#23 ·
I had another set of 1206 gaskets on hand, so I stacked two on each side. I understand the necessity to increase gasket thickness when dealing with decking and milling. That’s not the case here. It’ll “work” like that, but it doesn’t change the position of the runners traveling into the far corner of the port. It’ll still require extensive port work that may need welding on the roof.

Image


Image


Image
 
#24 ·
This Trick Flow R-series manifold arrived on my doorstep this morning. The final nail in the coffin for the Holley. I can’t justify wasting time with that turd when there are much better castings out there.

Image


Image



Image


Image
 
#26 ·
The new TFS is a nice piece design and manufacturing wise. I am gonna buy one and do it to the max to compare to the 2892 we run on our shop cars SBC....

We have had a number of 300-110s that were machined incorrectly over the past couple of years. Holley was good about exchanging them but it still sucks. I really like the design and it's been a staple for our Limited Dirt Late Model engine program but... with the QC issues, it's time to develop something new.
Will
 
#30 ·
The new TFS is a nice piece design and manufacturing wise. I am gonna buy one and do it to the max to compare to the 2892 we run on our shop cars SBC....

We have had a number of 300-110s that were machined incorrectly over the past couple of years. Holley was good about exchanging them but it still sucks. I really like the design and it's been a staple for our Limited Dirt Late Model engine program but... with the QC issues, it's time to develop something new.
Will
I've got a 2892 on the SBC in my drag car. I'll be comparing it against the TFS, and the other manifolds next season. The Holley was intended be a competitor, but failed to qualify.
 
#27 ·
Shame to hear about the Holley. About ten years ago I used them a lot and they were always great fitment wise. Power wise they would always be on top of a super vic with equal porting. Both the 300-25 and 300-110. I put the 300-25 on my personal 406 with afr 227 eliminator. Dirt cheap as well. Maybe find an older version. NOS perhaps?
 
#29 ·
#32 ·
To be fair, Holley says the 300-110 is "Ideal for classes that require cast iron heads that require an unported intake manifold."
I don't have a 1204, but it looks good with a 1205. Shouldn't be a problem with smaller port heads.

Image



For reference, here it is with a 1207.

Right bank...

Image


Image


Image



Left bank...

Image


Image


Image