Yellow Bullet Forums banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Pontiac aficionado
Joined
·
2,851 Posts
They are phuckin stupid and have no clue. Makes good press thou.

The jobless rate is the same. It's just that as time goes by and people run out their unemployment, the figures will drop. Yo duh.

How do they determine an unemployment rate? From people on the unemployment roles.


Maybe just not as many filing as in years past. But goes to show that 9% are still showing up on the roles.

How many are NEW filers?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,131 Posts
They are phuckin stupid and have no clue. Makes good press thou.

The jobless rate is the same. It's just that as time goes by and people run out their unemployment, the figures will drop. Yo duh.

How do they determine an unemployment rate? From people on the unemployment roles.


Maybe just not as many filing as in years past. But goes to show that 9% are still showing up on the roles.

How many are NEW filers?
EXACTLY......too many people dont see or know how the govt skews these figures
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,586 Posts
As peoples unemployment runs out they are not counted as unemployed. It,s all bullshit. Anyone who is self employed and is out of work, (unless they paid into unemployment) is not counted. Only people getting a check are counted. The real unemployment number is somewhere in the middle to high teens. Ya gotta remember, somtimes the Government lies. They have this habit of pissing on people and telling them it's raining.:-Shower
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
51,357 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Frankly, this doesn’t make a lot of sense. If only 36,000 jobs were added and 600,000 people stopped being unemployed, then the labor force should show a significant contraction. The lower overall rate makes sense if 600,000 people left the workforce, but not if the workforce remained the same. Otherwise, we’d have to conclude that 36,000 jobs represents 0.4% of all employment in the US.

Looking at the A-6 table, which compares numbers January 2010 to January 2011 (not seasonally adjusted), we can see that the unemployment rate for those without disabilities has dropped from 10.4% to 9.7%. The number of non-disabled adults outside the work force has grown substantially in that period, from 62.8 million to 64.7 million. That far outstrips population growth and indicates that people are still leaving the work force in large numbers. In the A-16 table for the same period (not seasonally adjusted), the number of people outside the workforce has grown from 83.9 million to 86.2 million, again showing a large increase.

The topline rate number looks better, but it also looks increasingly irrelevant. The Department of Labor shows that the average monthly growth of jobs over the last 12 months has been 97,000, not enough to keep up with population growth.
Lots of head scratchin' going on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,169 Posts
Remember how bad the media Hit the Bush admin. over the fact that when unemployment was under 5% from '03-'07 that only the Rich were finding Jobs???
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
435 Posts
And in 2 months they will revise it up .3-.7 as they have been doing ever since this nonsense has started. The initial numbers are ALWAYS wrong. Im more interested in seeing what they have to say about November.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top