Yellow Bullet Forums banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,687 Posts
why would you use the same grind?? I know the question your trying to ask though. The rollers big advantage is the early and late lift #s (basicly how fast it can open and the spring close the valve). To throw out a hp # is not possible without knowing alot of info. Long story short the roller will be better.
 

· T/S 368E
Joined
·
40,665 Posts

.

I was told there was a test & it was ~50 HP. Don't remember the exact deal, but it was a Chevy.
The guy never found the magazine, so I can't vouch for it. I would bet they did plenty of those tests somewhere,
when trying to sell the more expensive piece?? I'm surprised we don't see them on a cam site??

.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12,146 Posts
Alot of variables there. As already stated, a properly sized roller will get the valve open sooner and spend more time using the intake ports mid to high flow rates.

This will only see a gain if the cam compliments the flow of the curent head, compression ratio, and of course a upgraded valve train.

Last season I upgraded to an off the shelf roller cam, replacing a custom mechanical grind. I went .30 better in the 1/4. I am not sure if all that gain was the difference between roller VS Mechanical. I think some of it was the POS "Custom" cam.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,125 Posts
the only time that I did a back to back test (F/T solid - solid roller) IE same engine cam change only on the very first run (from memory) the car ran 2/10th slower & ~ 6 to7 mph faster, but went faster eventually overall. The cams were not identical grinds though.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,057 Posts
On my dyno i pulled a well developed comp flat tappet cam and replaced it with a comp roller of very similar specs(roller slightly smaller) and engine picked up 25HP peak with 28HP in places and picked up 1.5MPH at the track
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top