Joined
·
6,684 Posts
Jimmy, I don't think Chuck is saying, here or on the NSCA board that it's on right now, but maybe putting an idea out there for others to expand upon. Funds for the track could come from BOTH side's, not just org. but sponsors and racers fundraiseres etc. No payout money, just jackets. Run it sort of like a Orlando event with a total of 5 classes with same amount of cars from both "teams", say 4 or 5 cars per team per class. Event could be a 1 day event. Therefore track rental and cost could be kept low. Now I don't know what it would cost to rent say Milan or Martin say for a Friday night and all day Saturday, But with only payouts being 5 Jackets I don't think it would be too much money.
This might not be a bad thing as BOTH org.s could get an increase in car counts, MAYBE. The PRO racers could get off there chest's why don't run with NSCA and same with the NSCA guys. Maybe it's time to mend some "burnt bridges" to save the NSCA/PRO style of racing. Like what Tony N. and Spongy are doing now, but to the "managment".
NSCA is in need of help, PERIOD. Yes the last event did help, but even that was off a bit. The beast of the travelling show is going the same path as the dinosours! If they don't allow for more Racers/Spectators input, I'm affraid it won't be around. PRO does have the benefit of being owned by the media corp. therefore has a back-up plan.
Hell you could even get some of the money from the Bob Curran/Monty Mikho race. IF, just IF we could expand on that style of money between the "teams", that say Tony Nesbitt would race say John Schroeder for "X" amount of dollars, with a percent of the cut for the race race going to pay for the track rental.
Therefore the racers would get:
1. Money from there "grudge race" say first round for sure. Let them go into second with the option of another grudge race.
2. Bragging right to feed that hungry racers ego.
3. MAYBE help both org.s in the way of future car counts.
4. A jacket for the class winner to bragg about.
Just keep an open mind, John
This might not be a bad thing as BOTH org.s could get an increase in car counts, MAYBE. The PRO racers could get off there chest's why don't run with NSCA and same with the NSCA guys. Maybe it's time to mend some "burnt bridges" to save the NSCA/PRO style of racing. Like what Tony N. and Spongy are doing now, but to the "managment".
NSCA is in need of help, PERIOD. Yes the last event did help, but even that was off a bit. The beast of the travelling show is going the same path as the dinosours! If they don't allow for more Racers/Spectators input, I'm affraid it won't be around. PRO does have the benefit of being owned by the media corp. therefore has a back-up plan.
Hell you could even get some of the money from the Bob Curran/Monty Mikho race. IF, just IF we could expand on that style of money between the "teams", that say Tony Nesbitt would race say John Schroeder for "X" amount of dollars, with a percent of the cut for the race race going to pay for the track rental.
Therefore the racers would get:
1. Money from there "grudge race" say first round for sure. Let them go into second with the option of another grudge race.
2. Bragging right to feed that hungry racers ego.
3. MAYBE help both org.s in the way of future car counts.
4. A jacket for the class winner to bragg about.
Just keep an open mind, John