Yellow Bullet Forums banner

81 - 100 of 147 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,271 Posts
Why would the prosecutors consult the AG about a sentence? The AG is overstepping his authority to make a judgment on the sentence in this case. It’s the judges job to set a sentence, the prosecutor just request a sentence. How many cases does the AG really give a dam what the sentence is?
The fact is, Stone is trump's goon, buddy and trump is Barr's boss. Barr is trump's puppet and will do anything for this dictator. Barr says he wasn’t pressured, but he is complaining about the twitter post from trump, that are putting pressure on him.
Congress will have some embarrassing questions for this puppet, if he shows up.
The prosecutors recommended a sentence that was out of line with the case. These prosecutors work for the DOJ and Barr is in charge of it. It's not uncommon at all for the AG to be involved, stop believing everything the MSM tells you.

Look up what happened to the Black Panthers that were indicted for pressuring people to vote a certain way in 2008. Barr is an angel compared to Holder.
 

·
Behind Enemy Lines In Ca.
Joined
·
15,442 Posts
Its possible this criminal could have gotten 20 years with his conviction. The 9 to 7 is light. Like I said, the president could commute the sentence. Now Barr is squirming and asking the president to lay off twitter. But than lies by saying the president isn't pressuring him. There are outrages sentences given everyday, but this one is trump's goon.
You have no idea as to what you are talking about. The charges against Stone are all process charges. It was a set up by the Mueller prosecutors who have now resigned. Now it has come forward that the Jury forewoman is an attorney and ran for Congress as a dimoKKKRAT. She has posted many anti-Trump and anti-Stone statements on the internet. This whole case should be thrown out. To me you are nothing more than a sheep of Adam Schiff with all the BS that you spout on this forum.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,121 Posts
Why would the prosecutors consult the AG about a sentence? The AG is overstepping his authority to make a judgment on the sentence in this case. It’s the judges job to set a sentence, the prosecutor just request a sentence. How many cases does the AG really give a dam what the sentence is?
Hey dopey, the prosecutors work for the AG at the DOJ. (They all work for Trump.) As a matter of fact they consult with the "brass" on cases and discuss what they are going to recommend. In this very case they talked about it and concurred but lied when they went to court and asked for a much stiffer sentence. Why do you think they resigned?

Then, in a reversal on Feb. 11, the department said it would reduce the prison term it’s seeking. A senior DOJ official reportedly told CBS News’ Catherine Herridge that the department was shocked to see the sentencing recommendation and that it isn’t what the department was briefed on.
Barr is trump's puppet and will do anything for this dictator. Barr says he wasn’t pressured, but he is complaining about the twitter post from trump, that are putting pressure on him.
Trump has recommended nothing to Barr, even though he could. This is done all the time and it shows you have no understanding of the DOJ or courts or anything else. Barr said Trump's tweets are making his job more difficult because he has to respond to them.


Congress will have some embarrassing questions for this puppet, if he shows up.
He will crush them like he always does for their hypocrisy and ignorance.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,121 Posts
The right-wing nuts want the US to be as corrupt as Russia. Trump has no legal education or authority to tell the AG what to do. If trump would of had any constitutional authority he would have kept the other puppet and there wouldn’t have been a Mueller indictment. There was only one of the four prosecutors that quite, involved in the Mueller investigation. That one prosecutor was just doing his job in both cases and was not involved in any wrongdoing. Stone was convicted and sentenced by the by the United States legal system. It’s stupid to believe everyone involved in this case was politically motivated. The only ONE politically motivated is trump.
The constitution is the only thing protecting this country from being taken over by criminals. This president is doing his best to undermine our law enforcement as well as our constitution.
The ignorance here is laughable and it shows no understanding of the law, courts, DOJ or even basic high school civics.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,015 Posts
Discussion Starter #90
You have no idea as to what you are talking about. The charges against Stone are all process charges. It was a set up by the Mueller prosecutors who have now resigned. Now it has come forward that the Jury forewoman is an attorney and ran for Congress as a dimoKKKRAT. She has posted many anti-Trump and anti-Stone statements on the internet. This whole case should be thrown out. To me you are nothing more than a sheep of Adam Schiff with all the BS that you spout on this forum.
So in your world, lying to Congress and the FBI is a PROCESS CHARGE. He was still convicted on 7 counts or 7 crimes. Stone was convicted because he is guilty. This wasn’t an impeachment. The defendants couldn’t tell the jury how to vote. The prosecutor and defendant had to have witnesses and documents to prove their guilt or innocence.
Only one of the prosecution’s was involved in the Mueller/trump investigation. Let’s see the charges against him. He did nothing wrong.
You don’t know who or what the jury forman is or was. You are the puppet of FOX news. Stone had a defense attorney that knew a lot more about this jury than FOX news. The Forman of a jury is just one person. She had just one vote to convict or acquit. The worst she could do is hang the jury. What you and the FOX news people want is a jury that is bias for trump. The justice system has a process of appeals that the president has nothing to do with.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,121 Posts
So in your world, lying to Congress and the FBI is a PROCESS CHARGE. He was still convicted on 7 counts or 7 crimes. Stone was convicted because he is guilty. This wasn’t an impeachment. The defendants couldn’t tell the jury how to vote. The prosecutor and defendant had to have witnesses and documents to prove their guilt or innocence.
Only one of the prosecution’s was involved in the Mueller/trump investigation. Let’s see the charges against him. He did nothing wrong.
You don’t know who or what the jury forman is or was. You are the puppet of FOX news. Stone had a defense attorney that knew a lot more about this jury than FOX news. The Forman of a jury is just one person. She had just one vote to convict or acquit. The worst she could do is hang the jury. What you and the FOX news people want is a jury that is bias for trump. The justice system has a process of appeals that the president has nothing to do with.
Wrong, there could be a mistrial. You have no idea if she mislead or lied about herself in the voir dire.

What level were those crimes judged by DOJ management and what did they recommend for punishment for Stones crimes back in February?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,888 Posts
FOR MOLESTING CHILDREN? There is a big difference in molesting children and transferring obscene material to a minor. Children could find "obscene" material on this site.
Ya know I never jumped on the bandwagon of people here accusing you of pedophilia.

Now you have me questioning my judgment, you’re sounding like a rock spider.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,579 Posts
Interesting news about the jurors, especially the jury foreman...….the judge is in a tough spot now, she denied the defense motion to replace some biased jurors...……..if this gets appealed, it will blow up in her face. As for the DA's that resigned...… all of of them were heavily involved on the Muellar team all Democrats, and all biased ...…...gonna be fun watching this shit show implode.
(y)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,579 Posts
I didn’t "stick up" for anyone. Just calling you on your right-wing, right side lie.

I didn’t even vote for trump, why would I lie for him. They convicted Stone of lies to protect trump, not to prove any points. You have to wonder why so many think they have to lie to protect trump?
he lied about WikiLeaks
 

·
Behind Enemy Lines In Ca.
Joined
·
15,442 Posts
So in your world, lying to Congress and the FBI is a PROCESS CHARGE. He was still convicted on 7 counts or 7 crimes. Stone was convicted because he is guilty. This wasn’t an impeachment. The defendants couldn’t tell the jury how to vote. The prosecutor and defendant had to have witnesses and documents to prove their guilt or innocence.
Only one of the prosecution’s was involved in the Mueller/trump investigation. Let’s see the charges against him. He did nothing wrong.
You don’t know who or what the jury forman is or was. You are the puppet of FOX news. Stone had a defense attorney that knew a lot more about this jury than FOX news. The Forman of a jury is just one person. She had just one vote to convict or acquit. The worst she could do is hang the jury. What you and the FOX news people want is a jury that is bias for trump. The justice system has a process of appeals that the president has nothing to do with.
Your answer shows just how ill informed that you are. Her name is Tomeka Hart and her bias against President Trump and Roger Stone has been shown in numerous articles. Most of the charges are for process crimes. People get 3 years at the most unless you are a dimoKKKRAT and you get off scott free. Brennan and Clapper are two that lied to Congress and nothing has happened to them. 7-9 years is way over the top and what this is all about.

One last thing: Three Mueller prosecutors abruptly withdraw from Roger Stone case
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
375 Posts
I didn’t "stick up" for anyone. Just calling you on your right-wing, right side lie.

I didn’t even vote for trump, why would I lie for him. They convicted Stone of lies to protect trump, not to prove any points. You have to wonder why so many think they have to lie to protect trump?
So now your telling lies, perfect.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,384 Posts
In light of recent events, there is no Department of Justice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
32,846 Posts
So in your world, lying to Congress and the FBI is a PROCESS CHARGE. He was still convicted on 7 counts or 7 crimes. Stone was convicted because he is guilty. This wasn’t an impeachment. The defendants couldn’t tell the jury how to vote. The prosecutor and defendant had to have witnesses and documents to prove their guilt or innocence.
Only one of the prosecution’s was involved in the Mueller/trump investigation. Let’s see the charges against him. He did nothing wrong.
You don’t know who or what the jury forman is or was. You are the puppet of FOX news. Stone had a defense attorney that knew a lot more about this jury than FOX news. The Forman of a jury is just one person. She had just one vote to convict or acquit. The worst she could do is hang the jury. What you and the FOX news people want is a jury that is bias for trump. The justice system has a process of appeals that the president has nothing to do with.
Where you at, pussy?

Let's go why are you such a coward?

Can't back up that keyboard? Shocking ....
 
81 - 100 of 147 Posts
Top