Yellow Bullet Forums banner
1 - 20 of 39 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,776 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Has anyone tried them at all?How about with dry ice?I have had one for years but I never did a good test with it.I have put my gas cans in coolers of ice and it seems to help.I wanted to give it a try later on,I wanted to see what anybody thought on here.I want to get this thing in the 5.50's in the 1/8th when it cools off.

Thanks for the input

Later
 

· T/S 368E
Joined
·
40,684 Posts
.

They help, if the set up takes advantage of the denser charge.
All the class' I've ever ran didn't allow them. So I have no personal info.

.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,312 Posts
They work fine but are a PITA and not allowed in many classes. Cool gas is always better than warm gas. Back when I knew guys running stock they'd cool gas prior to a run in hot weather if they had competition or were trying to run fast as possible.
 

· Misanthropist
Joined
·
3,149 Posts
Why would such a seemingly trivial thing, be disallowed???
 

· Misanthropist
Joined
·
3,149 Posts
I was thinking about this last year. The majority of the "cool cans" out there use very small line (I think 3/8 is the largest). I was thinking of fabricating one that would work with -8 or -10 fuel line with AN fittings........ but haven't done so yet.
 

· Misanthropist
Joined
·
3,149 Posts
Really? I didn't know that. Though, 1/2" would only be -8, which is pretty much too small for a 'supply' line for most....

I'm still batting around the idea of making one.
 

· Eddie Haskell
Joined
·
7,851 Posts
Why would such a seemingly trivial thing, be disallowed???
Cooling the fuel made it harder to detect "additives". First banned in Pro Stock. Cooling the fuel is definately worth some power.
 

· Misanthropist
Joined
·
3,149 Posts
Cooling the fuel made it harder to detect "additives". First banned in Pro Stock. Cooling the fuel is definately worth some power.
L-A-M-E!!!
 

· Misanthropist
Joined
·
3,149 Posts
Not in the least....I just think the rule is outdated and lame.
 

· Eddie Haskell
Joined
·
7,851 Posts
Not in the least....I just think the rule is outdated and lame.
Ok, that rule was implemented when people were using P02 for an oxegenator. It was easier for tech to just ban the cool can. Now there are additives specific to fuel that are being used that are even harder to detect.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
839 Posts
I tried it on a very hot day. and you know what?? Same ET!

I had a 5 gallon aluminum fuel cell. I laid 3 bags of ice on it. The cell was ice cold. Car ran the same. In theory it seems like cold gas would create a denser charge. But I noticed nothing
 

· Registered
Joined
·
958 Posts
I tried it on a very hot day. and you know what?? Same ET!

I had a 5 gallon aluminum fuel cell. I laid 3 bags of ice on it. The cell was ice cold. Car ran the same. In theory it seems like cold gas would create a denser charge. But I noticed nothing
I think your fuel warmed up by the time it got to the carb. I'd try it further up stream unless the 5 gal was mounted up front.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,036 Posts
I'm thinking part of the gain is the fact you are cooling off the carb and part of the intake especially if you are using dry ice. Hell just put dry ice on the intake and carb no cool can needed. LOL
 

· Registered
Joined
·
839 Posts
I think your fuel warmed up by the time it got to the carb. I'd try it further up stream unless the 5 gal was mounted up front.

I am sure it got hot, but not for awhile. The cell was ice cold. The gas was ice cold.The engine was cooled down to ambient temp and was towed to the line. We had bags of ice on while waiting in the lanes. The fuel pump was not turned on/car was not started until we were in the burnout box. The gas entering the carb had to be ice cold. But no difference from the first pass, with no specialized cooling
 
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top