Yellow Bullet Forums banner
21 - 40 of 41 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
15,745 Posts
None of these were ported for this combo. As stated its going on a Fe adapter. The guy doesn’t have any ideas to what Cleveland intakes flow. They will take this data and adapt to head and see what they get. They only own two of those intakes. The rest were loaners as mine were. Then they can buy the intake that they deem close to head. You may or may not know Cleveland intakes are not overly available so weeding out the poor ones before spending.I think the information helps them a ton. For us guys who’ve already tested on track not so much. Jay brown told me on his dyno testing the torker intake was the biggest surprise out of quite a few.
I can tell you that putting any of those intakes on an adapter for a FE...you can throw all those numbers out the window. They won't mean a thing.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
32,248 Posts
Discussion Starter · #24 ·
They called me for intakes. Most of those will not fit factory heads which adapter is made. Which I explained and they never knew. They were hoping to find the rare roush intake. So if they buy that one they will have to cut up. Why they are not using billet or fabricated i have no idea.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
32,248 Posts
Discussion Starter · #26 ·
Most would assume the ram and roush intake would work best. The ram they actually were avoiding. The roush hard to find here as is the one Scott used. Unless they pavk everything up and send to sheetmetal boys its a crap shoot.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
15,745 Posts
Most would assume the ram and roush intake would work best. The ram they actually were avoiding. The roush hard to find here as is the one Scott used. Unless they pavk everything up and send to sheetmetal boys its a crap shoot.
All I'm saying is that even with the best candidate, it's a shit show. The port alignment just isn't there. The end runners are the issue. The ram has the best chance/will make the most power with the straighter end runners but any 351C single four intake is going to have the same issue no matter how good the intake is. The air has to make almost a 90* turn on those end runners. Not to mention trying to get enough area in the runners to feed more ci than the intakes were designed for.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
535 Posts
None of these were ported for this combo. As stated its going on a Fe adapter. The guy doesn’t have any ideas to what Cleveland intakes flow. They will take this data and adapt to head and see what they get. They only own two of those intakes. The rest were loaners as mine were. Then they can buy the intake that they deem close to head. You may or may not know Cleveland intakes are not overly available so weeding out the poor ones before spending.I think the information helps them a ton. For us guys who’ve already tested on track not so much. Jay brown told me on his dyno testing the torker intake was the biggest surprise out of quite a few.
On Jay's testing, the Cleveland intakes on the FE did about what they do on a Cleveland. The Strip Dominator and Torker were way up there, along with the Tunnel Ram.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steve.k

· Registered
Joined
·
15,745 Posts
There are several of them. It was a big deal and the rules ended up getting changed to allow a spacer between the intake and head. So the SBC guys take advantage of it as well.

View attachment 462786
Don't know why they'd bother with that nonsense. All the SS FE guys I know of are running sheet metal intakes but my knowledge is limited.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,138 Posts
Don't know why they'd bother with that nonsense. All the SS FE guys I know of are running sheet metal intakes but my knowledge is limited.
They are probably running GT.. I could run a sheet metal in GT.

New rules this year says you can't run in GT unless you have a front wheel drive conversion car. So there are many guys having to switch back to SS. In other words a traditional SS car you have to run the proper engine offered for that car. GT you can run any combo you want.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
15,745 Posts
The Cleveland intakes must offer as good as hp as the single plane or better readily available fe intakes otherwise whats the point?
What's the point? Marketing.
Problem is there really aren't any contemporary "good" single plane intakes for the FE. The whole adapter thing came about from a company called Pro Stock Engineering back in the 70's so you could run the Cleveland TR when it first came out. The Cleveland TR itself is outdated by decades, but it looks cool and makes -ok- power. The only answer, really, for making any serious power with an FE is a sheet metal TR but most of this is moot anyway because there's only a handfull of cyl heads with the potential to take advantage of any serious intake effort or make any serious hp/ci.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
856 Posts
The FE manifold adapter to use the Cleveland intakes was done years ago by Pro-Stock Engineering - as well as a few other Ford FE race components. The idea was slightly modified and re-introduced a few years ago.
Port alignment is a big deal - and the outer ports are a fair distance away - not ideal at all.

Short of a sheet metal intake - perhaps a welded up Victor intake or a welded up Trick Flow single plane would work
for high rpm race use?
The tunnel wedge does seem decent for dual 4 builds.
I haven't seen anyone modify the existing single plane manifolds - perhaps someone has?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
15,745 Posts
Swartz Racing Manifolds

View attachment 463183
Paul is one of the go-to's for FE sheet metal intakes. That's not for Clevelands. Super nice piece.
This is the Jay Brown Cleveland adapter. It's hard to see in the pics, but the end ports are at about a 30* angle.
Circuit component Audio equipment Passive circuit component Electronic engineering Computer hardware
 
21 - 40 of 41 Posts
Top