Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread.... - Yellow Bullet Forums
;

Go Back   Yellow Bullet Forums > Technical Section > Turbo Charged - Precision Turbo & Engine

Turbo Charged - Precision Turbo & Engine

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2017, 11:44 PM   #1
mrmike
Junior Member
Launchin
 
mrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton,Ohio
Posts: 263
Default Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Hello all.. I know this has been covered before but with all the new technology coming out these days I just thought I would bring it up again. I am finally trying to get my engine back together and have acquired a set of Garrett GTX5518R 88mm turbos so my potential power making goals have jumped up a bit over the PT 106mm that I had laying around. My engine will be in the 470 to 490ci range depending on if I decide on going with a 3.75 or a 3.91 stroke crank with my 4.50 bore. My heads are a small but tall port design that did flow in the high 490cfm range. It was set up originally for a BBC style 6.385 rod using a 2.100 rod journal and a .990 piston pin. My question is about the rods.. Old school train of thought was an aluminum rod at the power level this thing should be at but more and more I am hearing steel rods being used like Oliver's. What are your guys thoughts on the subject. Also any thoughts on the new BoostLine Connecting Rods by Wiseco since the size I need is available in their new line? Any insight would be greatly appreciated!!!
mrmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-28-2017, 11:51 PM   #2
zbrown
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,385
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Why not the tried and true Oliver if u want a steel rod?
__________________
Vbox whore FC
TT cummins
zbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 11:40 AM   #3
mrmike
Junior Member
Launchin
 
mrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton,Ohio
Posts: 263
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

My first thought was Olivers's but wanted to see what people are saying these days when it comes to possibly making 2500 to 3000 plus HP....
__________________
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-...dodge-charger/
Back in the day!
mrmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 11:44 AM   #4
mrmike
Junior Member
Launchin
 
mrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton,Ohio
Posts: 263
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

That is why I was asking about the new BoostLine Connecting Rods by Wiseco since I missed them at the PRI show...
__________________
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-...dodge-charger/
Back in the day!
mrmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 12:12 PM   #5
Crusty Nova
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
 
Crusty Nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,421
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

I'm far far from a veteran engine guy or even racer. But I've been researching this subject a lot. Aluminum Vs. Steel rod seems to come down to the shock and resonance from combustion whether controlled or uncontrolled (detonation) being transferred more harmfully with a steel rod than with an aluminum rod. A tuning mistake or wiring issue or injector problem, etc... Situation an aluminum rod might make the difference between a junk block and crank or just junked bearings/piston. At this power level whether big block or small block it seems the aluminum Rod path seems to be the clear choice as long as you accept the fact that there's a service life of the rods and the higher the engine speed and piston weight the shorter the Rod life. The near zero tolerance mistake with aluminum rods is if something in the drivetrain breaks i.e. Transmission, rearend or driveshaft, don't make another single pass without changing the rods.

In regards to the Wiseco rod, seems like just a marketing scheme to me. Rods typically don't break in the area they've added mass. Seems to me they did something different to set their Chinese Rod apart from every other just for attention.
__________________
1962 Chevy II hardtop Just a Dumb Ass having fun with a TT LS Street car.
Crusty Nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 12:55 PM   #6
masnart
Junior Member
Spooled up
 
masnart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 173
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

I mean, this guy just went into the 3's, 1/8th mile at under 400ci LS-based motor. With GRP aluminum rods. I don't think there is an issue using aluminum rods. And just to be straight with you, if I was building a car like yours that had the potential to easily go bottom 4's, I would be consulting with reputable engine builders, not an internet forum.

__________________
2000 WS6 M6 - 370ci | BW S480 | Moser 9" | TH400 | [email protected], 1.25 - 60'
masnart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 12:57 PM   #7
Weldwade
Junior Member
Launchin
 
Weldwade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 282
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

There is always talk about service life of an aluminum rod also. There is a lot of good info out there on this from big name builders and manufacturers. I personally know several people with aluminum rod engines ranging from 2000 to 3500 hp. I currently have billet steel olivers in my engine and they are going to get changed to aluminum first chance I get. I bring this up because I know a guy who has no less than 300 passes on an aluminum rod supercharged BBC on M5 making an easy 2500 hp. The trick is tune up and knowing when you possibly may have hurt something ie DATA LOGGING!!!!
Weldwade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 01:09 PM   #8
prost63vette
Senior Member
Smoked Another SBC
 
prost63vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: las vegas
Posts: 16,746
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Quote:
Originally Posted by masnart View Post
I mean, this guy just went into the 3's, 1/8th mile at under 400ci LS-based motor. With GRP aluminum rods. I don't think there is an issue using aluminum rods. And just to be straight with you, if I was building a car like yours that had the potential to easily go bottom 4's, I would be consulting with reputable engine builders, not an internet forum.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yqW...ature=youtu.be
He had steel rods before ( making about 2200 hp and went to aluminum ) when making over 2400 hp I would go with GRP Aluminum rods just my two cents . Also this form has some pretty knowledgeable people just saying
__________________
Pimp Daddy Troy 4.19 @ 176 mph / 6.54 at 204 400ci sbc on 10.5 tires and KAM Efi (AKA COMSYNC ) system ,Hughes performance

Last edited by prost63vette; 03-01-2017 at 01:12 PM.
prost63vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 02:42 PM   #9
TurboII
Senior Member
Smoked Another SBC
 
TurboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moncure, NC
Posts: 5,384
Garage
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Definitely go aluminum rods if it will truly be pushed to its max capability. If you rattle it the aluminum rods may save the engine and 9 times out of 10 they will remain straight. The steel rods can't make this claim. Don't get me wrong I am a steel rod fan but not in this instance. My rod pics would be BME, R&R and MGP. I went with aluminum rods in my billet SBC that has the same Gen 2 GTX5533R turbos.
TurboII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 02:42 PM   #10
masnart
Junior Member
Spooled up
 
masnart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 173
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Quote:
Originally Posted by prost63vette View Post
He had steel rods before ( making about 2200 hp and went to aluminum ) when making over 2400 hp I would go with GRP Aluminum rods just my two cents . Also this form has some pretty knowledgeable people just saying
Oh, for sure it does Prostock, but I was just being real with the guy. I mean putting myself in his shoes, if I was going to drop god knows how many tens of thousands of dollars into a motor, I would be talking to someone that I know for a fact could set me up good.
__________________
2000 WS6 M6 - 370ci | BW S480 | Moser 9" | TH400 | [email protected], 1.25 - 60'
masnart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:14 PM   #11
Dustin87
Junior Member
Launchin
 
Dustin87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 337
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

My BBC had the best billet rod Oliver made and it served me well for over 300 passes. I contemplated aluminum but ended up with a Crower Maxbillet this time following the advise of my builder.
Dustin87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:28 PM   #12
mrmike
Junior Member
Launchin
 
mrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton,Ohio
Posts: 263
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Quote:
Originally Posted by masnart View Post
Oh, for sure it does Prostock, but I was just being real with the guy. I mean putting myself in his shoes, if I was going to drop god knows how many tens of thousands of dollars into a motor, I would be talking to someone that I know for a fact could set me up good.
Sound advice for sure and trust me when I say that I have been in contact with some of the best in the business about this engine and there have been some different opinions shared. This why I always like to ask people who have actually spent their own hard earned money to make the kind of HP that I am reaching for. That is what makes this forum so awesome because where else are you going to find guys with firsthand knowledge like that!
__________________
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-...dodge-charger/
Back in the day!
mrmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 10:44 AM   #13
TurboII
Senior Member
Smoked Another SBC
 
TurboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moncure, NC
Posts: 5,384
Garage
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Don't get me wrong, I am a steel rod guy. However based on not only HP level but also tuning experience and more explicitly tuning experience with the specific engine family, head design etc. It can be an extremely expensive lesson if a tuning mistake is made at the power levels we are talking about. I went aluminum mostly for insurance not necessarily because I think they are the ultimate rod made. If all goes well I may even go back to steel rods during a future freshen up if I feel confident the aluminum rods are no longer needed. I have a bit of an advantage in that my billet SBC basically runs a 6.385" BBC rod that is just .050" thinner and uses a standard SBC 2.100" rod bearing. Oliver offers their BBC rods as a small journal (2.100") and then only needs to be narrowed down on her big end. Hope this helps.
TurboII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 12:33 PM   #14
prost63vette
Senior Member
Smoked Another SBC
 
prost63vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: las vegas
Posts: 16,746
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

Aluminum rods FTW Why take a chance your welcome
__________________
Pimp Daddy Troy 4.19 @ 176 mph / 6.54 at 204 400ci sbc on 10.5 tires and KAM Efi (AKA COMSYNC ) system ,Hughes performance
prost63vette is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-02-2017, 12:48 PM   #15
wheelsup69
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
 
wheelsup69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,183
Default Re: Another max effort twin turbo rods question thread....

I had steel fail last year. Cost me a block, crank, rods, 3 pistons, oil pan, oil down. Aluminum now.
__________________
DSA Architects www.dsa-mt.com

wheelsup69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Yellow Bullet LLC
 

Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.