Yellow Bullet Forums banner

stolen Cuda found,cops refuse to get it back

598K views 3.4K replies 263 participants last post by  Dom 332  
#1 ·
#4 ·
OP are you drunk? How is it the cops fault?

So if your neighbors want you arrested, but what they want you arrested for is not against the law, and the cops wont arrest you, they should be mad at the cops? Oh, ok.

"This sec­tion barred pros­e­cu­­tion for theft completed more than three years before commence­ment of pros­e­cu­­tion where state produced no evidence that defendant retained some form of interest in or control over the stolen prop­erty after pos­ses­sion was given to third-party purchaser, even though final pay­ment was made by third party within three years of filing in­for­ma­­tion. State v. Bailey, 94 Or App 767, 767 P2d 114 (1989)"
 
#3,004 ·
Yep. Don't understand that three year statute of limitations on stolen property. Had this been stolen art from a museum or say from Jewish people from WWII, and it was found in a home in Oregon I would bet large amounts of money it would be immediately seized by some law enforcement agency, and held in safe keeping until the legal side of ownership was sorted out. The current thief in possession sounds like a rich douchebag that has no morals. Find him, F-him, and forget him.

The fact he never put the car in his name is highly suspicious.
 
#10 ·
Why would he have to wait three years? Just go get plates and insurance, show up and drive that bitch away. If the cops show up you show them your title, reg, ins and tell them to have a nice day. You can't get in trouble for stealing your own car can you?
 
#17 ·
The actual OWNER should have the keys to the car, go drive it home, INS and tag it with the ORIGINAL title and the have the police report handy of when it was stolen. Looks like indisputable line of REAL ownership to me.
Third parties take in the ass. That's what happens when you buy stolen property.
The STATE should have seized the car as soon as the its VIN reappeared. Then returned it to the rightful owner.
 
#20 ·
The actual OWNER should have the keys to the car, go drive it home, INS and tag it with the ORIGINAL title and the have the police report handy of when it was stolen. Looks like indisputable line of REAL ownership to me.
There's a catch. The ORIGINAL title may have been superseded, possibly by a bonding company who didn't do their homework. If that's the case, it all has to be worked out in civil court. If the original owners show up at the 3rd party's home with the original title and just take the car, THEY might be the ones who wind up in the Steel Chateau.

The current title status HAS to be determined.
 
#22 ·
Really dumb and not factual title to this thread!
 
#40 ·
This! Shit bag probably has some political connections. For the TRUE owners of the car, I hope this ass wipe doesn't have it crushed or something in spite. Not trying to be a keyboard commando but I don't think I could sit on my ass if I knew where MY stolen car was sitting.
 
#46 ·
I had a buddy go through the same thing on a classic indian motorcycle. It was in his family since new in the 1920s it was stolen and ten years later he found it at a swap meet for sale. He contacted the police and they told him it had been to long and if he wanted it back he had to buy it back? He ended up buying it back and then the insurance company wanted the money back they paid him for it? It was a big legal battle that cost him alot. Real bullshit.
 
#62 ·
Who tried to insure it it was impounded for and the original owners were sent a letter claiming that it would be Auctioned off if they didn't pay the fees. WHen the called about it they were told the owner came and paid the fees and took the car. My question is How did he show proof of owner ship when the sent a letter to the last registered owner and title holder.