![]() |
|
|||||||
| The Bullet ~ Handguns, Rifles and Shotguns TREE HUGGERS NOT WELCOME!!! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,410
|
Quote:
gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,410
|
Quote:
gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Jr Stockers rule
Smoked another BBC
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pinckneyville IL
Posts: 3,261
|
Quote:
n133 doesn't meter quite as well as the ball powders. With your lyman or harrel you should be close to .0002. I load more for accuratcy than speed. I can't wait to get my hands on the new imr8208xbr powder.
__________________
real racecars have doors and 3 pedals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Junior Member
Burnout box
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
Im sure he cut it down to 20" because he is using a can which in actuality he probably picked up velocity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,410
|
Quote:
gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Junior Member
Burnout box
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
|
Well from the picture it looks like a savage 10fp , these come with 24" barrels ... he cut 4"s off by cutting the barrel down yet gained 8"s of Suppressor. Another big misconseption in the shooting world is a suppressor makes a rifle less accurate or slows down the velocity ..... this couldnt be farther from the truth. A suppressor actually is an addition to barrel length. It isnt in the grooves being rotated on rifleing in a suppressor but it does still have pressure channeled behind the bullet in the suppressor. This gives the bullet more fps, The longer you can keep a bullet in a barrel or velocity chamber , the faster it will go. This is the reason for the 24"-30" barrels to keep the ballistic coeficient high. In the old days when most barrels were made in a humting contour , barrel deflection was AWFUL .... thats what brought the bull contour or #7 and smaller into the equation. Barrel deflection is still there today but not as aparent as it was years ago. Anyway suppressors pick up velocity and makes guns a little more accurate due to the extra velocity it has picked up .... flatter projectile is more accurate , the more the velocity the flatter the projectile flies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Junior Member
Launchin
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
Cutting the barrel to 20"... keeps overall length the same as it was without the 6" of can on the end. The other thing is... shorter barrel = stiffer barrel. The factory barrel length was 26". I don't recall what model the rifle is... either a model 10/110 or 12/112... and I don't feel like digging the gun out to confirm one way or the other. ![]() I just know the 'smith hacked 6" off the barrel to accomodate the 6" AAC Ranger suppressor. Unfortunately, I haven't gotten into reloading yet... and quite frankly, I don't think I do enough shooting anymore to justify it. My ammo choices are limited to factory stuff. Next I'd like to run through it... is the Federal Gold Medal Match 69gr stuff...
__________________
Art Wittig / Reading, PA
Last edited by Yullose; 11-03-2009 at 06:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Senior Member
Smoked another BBC
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,410
|
Quote:
A bullet traveling thru a barrel is nothing more than an experiment in pneumatics. There is no explosion like in black powder, but a build up of gass pressures. When there is no gass the bullet ain't moving. Pressure is a direct measurment of resistence caused by friction. You could in theory do the samething with water pressure. Now when the resistence is removed the pressure falls off sharply. So I have to assume the "can" does more than one thing, and possibly a third thing if everything were near perfect. If the bullet will drop thru the "can" there is a reduction of resistence, but this isn't always bad. You see the "can" is also acting as a tuner, as well as compressing the end of the barrel ever so much. And interesting experiment would be to make a sleeve that's about 1.38" in diameter and maybe 2.5" long. Split the sleeve and rebore it with a shim inside the split to fit the barrel. Install the sleeve on the end of the barrel with about 30 inch pounds of torque. Measure the velocity gained or lost. Now tighten it up to about sixty inch pound and compair. When you find the sweet spot for velocity and torque on the clamping screws write the figures down. Now move the sleeve out about a half inch and see what it does to your group size. Go back a quarter inch and try again. Welcome to the world of tuners in the crudest form! The increase in velocity is because you've compressed the barrel bore about .00025". Another little experiment you ought to try is to make a sleeve about .38" wide by about 1.5" in diameter, and bored to fit the can's OD (do not use hard steel!). Try moving it along the can to see if your group size shrinks. If it does you just learned the lesson of barrel harmonics. Should you try this experiment, and it works for you, keep a log on your settings. They'll change with every load change (bullet/velocity and even some powders). The second tuner I built shrank the group size on a Cooper rimfire from the mid sixes down to the low twos at fifty yards. And it wasn't a good one. gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Junior Member
Pre-Staged
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 53
|
bob white in nj is a benchrest shooter and gunsmith. he works with savage. look on his web shooters corner.com he can build it or get it or my have it.he is one of the biggest dealers in benchrest and varmint guns. he has built me alot of guns over the years. he knows his shit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Junior Member
Spooled up
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 181
|
What kind of scopes do you have on those two Savages?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Junior Member
Launchin
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure the .17hmr is a 6-18x50 and the .223 is a 6-24x40. I'd have to dig the rifles out to see what the numbers are on them for sure... They were the best money vs performance I could find. I almost bought Nikons for them, but they were just a little too much money. I just don't shoot often enough to justify megabucks in optics. Simmons and BSA however, are where I draw the line. Any of those I looked at were absolute garbage.
__________________
Art Wittig / Reading, PA
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|