Just curious, but how much power (RWHP) will twin 6766's support on a 404ci ls ? im really new to the turbo scene so im just trying to get a feel for what i have planned out, pros and cons, thanks.
What sort of diameters or CSA do the different housings have ?
ie T3, T3 V-Band, and T4 say even for a same number A/R ?
We seen a thread discussing crossover diameter for a single setup, and it seemed that 2.5" OD was excessive in many cases, and than 2.25 or even 2" was better suited to keep faster spool, but no real negative effect on performance
So for a twin application, would even a large T3 V-banded turbine housing be much smaller than say 2" ?
What sort of pipe diameters entering the turbo is considered ideal for twins ?
Ive started to weld up some truck manifolds, and was going to stick a 90deg Sch10 2" ID pipe onto it. Would that be too small for the likes of a pair of 6766's and 1300hp or so ?
2.5" OD would be my other easy option with thinner wall tubing, although those bends are much longer radius, so might be difficult to fit.
And is w/g placement critical to overall flow ?
I'd be taking the w/g almost directly off where the cast is cut, so prior to, or part of the 90deg bend
I have a sbf 331 with twin 6266, I had the t3 v band housings on and at. 18 psi she went. 9.30. Then we were seeing high back pressure so we switched to the t4. .81 housings. We did not change nothing I the tune and with just the housing changes we went 8.7 at 163 with same 18 psi. The t3 housings are big restrictions.
I have a sbf 331 with twin 6266, I had the t3 v band housings on and at. 18 psi she went. 9.30. Then we were seeing high back pressure so we switched to the t4. .81 housings. We did not change nothing I the tune and with just the housing changes we went 8.7 at 163 with same 18 psi. The t3 housings are big restrictions.
Heat Effected Zone, what engine size? How aggressive cam duration?
No hard horsepower or back pressure numbers from me. But here's what I have to offer: 370" 3555# 159mph trap speed, 6262 .81 v-band housings 21# boost fairly aggressive cam. Added 2# boost IAT went up 24-26* car went 159 again.
Its on a 449" gen 3 hemi. With the .96 at t4 housings at 30# I haven't logged back pressure but with less than 2 # springs in the gates I'm putting 30 on top to make 30.. . We are 3500# in a 2009 challenger and have been 7.82 @ 181
No one said it was perfect, but it has been done many times. I am not being argumentative....just have seen the results first hand. Tim's Pinto, the Orange Camaro on drag week (he even had the V-band housings!) just un-real and worked. It's not what I would do but hard to argue with the results.
That would be ridiculous on the street, and hardly useable!
I have 60mms on my car with a 374" motor and out of the box AFR 205cc heads and it is crazy on the street with just pump gas. I have been 148mph just as the car looks in my avatar on 93 octane. I bet you could make 850+rwhp or so on strait 93 octane with an around 400" setup and twin 6766s. Obviously on Race Gas or Ethanol, you could make a lot more.
Didn't mean to clutter up the thread with my junk, I just wanted to prove that you can do plenty with 66s!
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Yellow Bullet Forums
23.7M posts
139.6K members
Since 2005
A forum community dedicated to drag racing drivers and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about racing, builds, pro mods, hot rods, events, turbos, nitrous, superchargers, and more!