I'll start this by stating that I've not had but a few experiences with trying to use hydraulic lifters in a somewhat race type situation with none being very successful. Been trying to find the missing upper rpm power in my ls-2 combo for a couple months now. Have checked everything and nothing is obviously wrong. Cam timing, head flow, valve springs, etc. Combo that this setup was copied from made peak power at 6200 while my starts trailing off at 5700-5800 and is down a solid 50hp over 6000. Since everything has checked out fine, it's looking like I'm seeing some type of lifter/ and or valve float issues but from all the opinions out there it getting impossible to determine whether or not it could be the lifters pumping up or collapsing. I know there's guys out there making ls motors fly that are still using hydraulic lifters so could someone please enlighten me? Will excessive upper rpm oil pressure cause pump up? This I've wondered since I've replaced the pan and oil pump. My oil pressure is pretty stout now at high rpm where it was only seeing around 50psi stock. Sorry bout the long winded questions but I really need some input from people who have dealt with hydraulic lifters...
After putting the cam wear problem behind us, you get to enjoy two additional benefits with Schubeck “Zero Lash” Hydraulic lifter technology:
1. An RPM increase, because they will not pump-up. We all know that lifters pump up, causing the valves to hang open, which in turn, puts a lid on the engine's rev ability. The Rev limit usually starts around 6,000 RPM.
Schubeck “Zero Lash” Hydraulic drag racing lifters are a drop-in prevention for the pump-up problem because Zero Lash means no preloading of the hydraulic travel. Preloading sets the stage for lifters to pump up, which is like an RPM governor. You set the them as you would a solid lifter, but as close to "0" lash as you can get with a tight a tight .002 feeler gage. The engines' rpm limit will be higher, just like having solid lifters.
2. A power increase, because they will not leak down. Valves lose lift when leakdown occurs.
Loss of power from "Leak down” occurs when the valves lose lift because the lifters fail to support the open valve under the spring pressure. This is caused by oil bleeding past the hydraulic piston in the lifter. When multiplied by the rocker arm ratio, as much as .100 or more in valve lift can be lost. You never know when it occurs or how bad you may have this power robbing engine cancer, but we do know how it can be prevented. Schubeck "Zero Lash Technology lifters restrict plunger travel, limiting the leak down to between .012-.015; if it occurs at all.
So could that be any more confusing? That's the same thing I'm reading everywhere. Could it really be that much on the edge? I know there's guys having no problem whatsoever getting 6500 out of hydraulic rollers so what gives??? Thanks..
I have one customer that uses hyd lifters in a race type car, it is a turbocharged LSX 447. I used the Morel lifters without link bars, a double spring with 200 on the seat and 500 open pressure, Harland Sharp rockers with a stud girdle I made to keep the rockers stable. It has a SS ex valve and Ti intake. He normally shifts around 7600rpm, but has been 8100 a few times. I have never ran the engine on the dyno, but the engine looks to peak around 7000-7200 and drift off over that.
Thanks for the reply. Is the morel you used the zero lash race lifter or the standard lash version? I've got a set of morels on the way. Hope it fixes the problem. What kind of oil pressures did this engine have? Thanks...
Edit: just saw you said without link bars so I would assume that's the morel drop in lifter for use with the factory buckets.
Thanks for the reply. Is the morel you used the zero lash race lifter or the standard lash version? I've got a set of morels on the way. Hope it fixes the problem. What kind of oil pressures did this engine have? Thanks...
Edit: just saw you said without link bars so I would assume that's the morel drop in lifter for use with the factory buckets.
I have a set of Comp shaft rockers that gave me a fit for adjusting and they were doing the same thing. I was using the comp "r" lifters. I finally set them at zero lash with the engine warm, and let it go. Before I did that it would only rpm to around 5800rpm. It seemed/sounded like it was hitting the rev limiter.
Also, I had restricted tip push rods in it and pulled them as well.
Are you still using the Comp shaft rockers? I just bought the set that was listed in the classifieds, and I was planning to use them with regular LS7 lifters in my 408. It's going to be a turbo build, so I don't plan on needing rpm higher than 6,500.
No I pulled them off. They were something I was talked into buying and did not really need. I put the stockers on them with correct preload and push rod length. I have not looked back.
Will excessive upper rpm oil pressure cause pump up? This I've wondered since I've replaced the pan and oil pump. My oil pressure is pretty stout now at high rpm where it was only seeing around 50psi stock.
Virtually all our wet sump engines peak around 70-75psi oil pressure--street and race--with hydraulic lifters spinning anywhere from 6500-7500.
What does your dyno graph look like at around 5700? Even on a chassis dyno, weak valve springs or just valve trouble period will cause the graph line to go from somewhat smooth to what appears to be graphed "static" in a phone line or some shit.
Virtually all our wet sump engines peak around 70-75psi oil pressure--street and race--with hydraulic lifters spinning anywhere from 6500-7500.
What does your dyno graph look like at around 5700? Even on a chassis dyno, weak valve springs or just valve trouble period will cause the graph line to go from somewhat smooth to what appears to be graphed "static" in a phone line or some shit.
Graph trails off real smooth. No real signs of valve float. I checked the springs when I pulled it apart the other day. They had 145-150 on the seat and 425-430 open. They were brand new, the ones that come on the tfs heads.
This is what I've been thinking. That's why the switch to morels. Still waiting on them to arrive. Also thinking about switching to an adjustable rocker setup so I can dial in the pre-load which might be the only way to determine if they are pumping up or bleeding off.
We used the morel standard travel hyd lifters with alot of sucess . spun our setup to 8K with a sheet metal intake. We used harland sharp rebuilt stock rockers. 80 psi oil .... Is the motor exactly the same as the one you coppied? intake? cam ? Tb? springs? exhaust? any 1 change can bottle the motor up....
Different exhaust. Mine has 1-7/8" arh, there's had 1-3/4" slp. Mine has a magnaflow catback, there's had an slp. I've tested the catback. Pulled it loose and to the side at the track which netted absolutely no gain. Haven't pulled the merge compeletly off to see if that could be something. Shouldn't, both the arh and slp's have real similar merge collectors. Other differences are the roller rockers, comp gold on mine vs. comp adjustable magnum on there's, and there's was an 08 with about 1500miles on the clock while mine is an 07 with about 11000. That's about all I can think of.
I ran some $400 rockers I got from Vengance with my old TFS 215's. I ran a 240/244 with the stock TFS springs I think and it all pulled to 7200. I ran Comp lifters. Maybe check with Ron @ Vengeance on those rockers.
Can you post the dyno sheet? Sorry if you did work blocks pics so i can't see them till i get home.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Yellow Bullet Forums
23.7M posts
139.6K members
Since 2005
A forum community dedicated to drag racing drivers and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about racing, builds, pro mods, hot rods, events, turbos, nitrous, superchargers, and more!