PDA

View Full Version : My thoughts on the NMRA


Sam Vincent
07-02-2008, 12:18 AM
What a freak'n joke. Charlie & Co are going to run the NMRA in the ground!

No weight breaks to make the SSO/nitrous cars competitive ( Oh forgot it's PROCHARGER super street outlaw now) and while they wouldn't Allow Robbie Blankenship to pass tech in Bradenton because tech felt the rack & pinion was a few inches to far forward, they go and change the rules in SSO to allow Urist new illegal car to be legal, Well from were I set they still didn't get it all fixed for him and still think the car is illegal. Rules state (even in the new revision) that you had to have a "stock unaltered drive shaft tunnel) His tunnel his cut out and put back in, ( maybe for chassis work) but the rear section of the tunnel is custom fabricated from the "main hoop" to about 8" forward of said hoop. that isn't legal by the rules.

It's funny how when some or certain racers push the rules, NMRA says it's "beyond the intention of the rule" and other certain racers do the same thing and it's called a "Gray Area".

I tell ya what it is, It's the BUDDY CLUB stronger than ever in the NMRA, and I think will eventually be it's downfall.

I remember last year at Milan when I had my chin spoiler, Rules stated minimum clearance was 3" ( spoiler was 3 1/8"-3 1/4" from ground) and couldn't not reach beyond the front leading edge of the bumper cover and IT DID NOT. Thom said it was OK when being teched in, now hrs later after I crossed the scales on a "Test" pass, Thom came over and said "I could run it tonight in Qualifying, but had to remove it for tomorrow". How is it legal Friday night and not legal Saturday morning. Anyway Someone cried over and I was told to remove it even thought it fit within rules. Not Fast Forward to Columbus ( I'm there helping TIM in H/S) and see two SSO cars, Manny & Macdonald with the very some thing I was told wasn't legal or "beyond the intent of the rules" in Milan, MI. That is favoritism any way you look at it.

Yet Urist's car with all rear seat area sheetmetal removed ( not just between frame rails either), drive shaft tunnel modified/fabricated/replaced, and the frame rail notched all the way to the rear bumper cover. is not past the intent of the rules, it's a Gray Area. And Now the rules committee change it to keep him legal , while pushing other races away.

NMRA can take there weight and stick up their A$$----------------------

Butch Kemp
07-02-2008, 02:00 PM
What a freak'n joke. Charlie & Co are going to run the NMRA in the ground!

No weight breaks to make the SSO/nitrous cars competitive ( Oh forgot it's PROCHARGER super street outlaw now) and while they wouldn't Allow Robbie Blankenship to pass tech in Bradenton because tech felt the rack & pinion was a few inches to far forward, they go and change the rules in SSO to allow Urist new illegal car to be legal, Well from were I set they still didn't get it all fixed for him and still think the car is illegal. Rules state (even in the new revision) that you had to have a "stock unaltered drive shaft tunnel) His tunnel his cut out and put back in, ( maybe for chassis work) but the rear section of the tunnel is custom fabricated from the "main hoop" to about 8" forward of said hoop. that isn't legal by the rules.

It's funny how when some or certain racers push the rules, NMRA says it's "beyond the intention of the rule" and other certain racers do the same thing and it's called a "Gray Area".

I tell ya what it is, It's the BUDDY CLUB stronger than ever in the NMRA, and I think will eventually be it's downfall.

I remember last year at Milan when I had my chin spoiler, Rules stated minimum clearance was 3" ( spoiler was 3 1/8"-3 1/4" from ground) and couldn't not reach beyond the front leading edge of the bumper cover and IT DID NOT. Thom said it was OK when being teched in, now hrs later after I crossed the scales on a "Test" pass, Thom came over and said "I could run it tonight in Qualifying, but had to remove it for tomorrow". How is it legal Friday night and not legal Saturday morning. Anyway Someone cried over and I was told to remove it even thought it fit within rules. Not Fast Forward to Columbus ( I'm there helping TIM in H/S) and see two SSO cars, Manny & Macdonald with the very some thing I was told wasn't legal or "beyond the intent of the rules" in Milan, MI. That is favoritism any way you look at it.

Yet Urist's car with all rear seat area sheetmetal removed ( not just between frame rails either), drive shaft tunnel modified/fabricated/replaced, and the frame rail notched all the way to the rear bumper cover. is not past the intent of the rules, it's a Gray Area. And Now the rules committee change it to keep him legal , while pushing other races away.

NMRA can take there weight and stick up their A$$----------------------
X2 I got hit with 100lbs.
no more testing needed for me.

Jim Craig
07-03-2008, 09:00 AM
X2 I got hit with 100lbs.
no more testing needed for me.

Has anybody said why you (your combination) got hit with the brick? It has been unfortunate that you haven't gotten a win yet -- but throw weight at you for having the potential chance of winning -- OUCH.............Good Luck

Sam Vincent
07-03-2008, 11:23 AM
Sam Vincent is now banned from this site. If people cannot make their point without using vulgarity, then they...

A. Go back to school and learn how to articulate points.
B. Nip it in the bud.
C. Attend regular anger management classes.
Reply With Quote

Real Professional Scott, why don't you just say something bad about my Mother. You my friend are NOBODY!

Butch Kemp
07-03-2008, 02:57 PM
Has anybody said why you (your combination) got hit with the brick? It has been unfortunate that you haven't gotten a win yet -- but throw weight at you for having the potential chance of winning -- OUCH.............Good Luck

One of the rules committee said because i was capable of putting a tenth on the field in BG 100lbs was called for.
I dont think they looked at my 1.22 60' compared to the 2nd fastest car though.I think it was 8 hundreths slower, (just to the 60')

DOUGHBOY RACING
07-03-2008, 03:09 PM
Oh so now the rules change race to race to keep it a tight field ay, well what ever happened to incentive to be able to tune your car to beat the other guy. A tenth come on that boils down to a little better tuning on behalf of the other drivers and a little better reaction time. They should just mandate one combination and say may the best engine builder and tuner win and show their stripes.

FSC Aaron
07-03-2008, 03:29 PM
The rules don't change race to race. One change after the third race.

George Klass
07-03-2008, 03:40 PM
Actually, the rule changes are really "rules adjustments" more than anything else. If the rules committee knew then (at the beginning of the season) what they know now (three races into the season), this is how the season would have started. And the same people that are complaing now would have probably been complaining in January.

The really sharp guys are the guys that know how the game is played, and sandbag for the first three events, LOL.

Butch Kemp
07-03-2008, 03:46 PM
Actually, the rule changes are really "rules adjustments" more than anything else. If the rules committee knew then (at the beginning of the season) what they know now (three races into the season), this is how the season would have started. And the same people that are complaing now would have probably been complaining in January.

The really sharp guys are the guys that know how the game is played, and sandbag for the first three events, LOL.

I'm like 8th in pionts and havent won shit.

Damn Yankee
07-03-2008, 05:07 PM
The rules don't change race to race. One change after the third race.

Then tell me how a In-Line cylinder head that has NEVER seen competition in any heads up series gets slapped with a 175lb penalty ?

Butch Kemp
07-03-2008, 05:50 PM
Then tell me how a In-Line cylinder head that has NEVER seen competition in any heads up series gets slapped with a 175lb penalty ?

Good point, never thought of that.

blown54
07-03-2008, 06:20 PM
its like the price of oil, its all spectulation.lol

sad but true.

dentboy
08-29-2008, 04:30 PM
Is this considerd vulgarity, I think thom is a jerk off, He has a big chip on his shoulder and anytime I've had my car teched in, it's like he hasnt gotten laid in a year, He's gotta relax, did NHRA turn him down or something? Just my 2 cents