View Full Version : we need a outlaw 632
another69camaro
04-12-2009, 11:25 AM
lots of heads up type cars around here that don't fit 8.50 index or 10.5 rules.anybody else interested in running something like outlaw 632 up here.sounds like it would fit in real good considering there are a lot of full chassis cars up here that would like to run a heads up type class.
wazslow
04-14-2009, 12:40 PM
lots of heads up type cars around here that don't fit 8.50 index or 10.5 rules.anybody else interested in running something like outlaw 632 up here.sounds like it would fit in real good considering there are a lot of full chassis cars up here that would like to run a heads up type class.
Im just not sure how many classes can be made really. Pretty soon your going to have 3 cars in each of 50 classes. I mean look at cecil's 7.50 index, there were 2 cars in the whole class....
Honk if parts fall off
04-14-2009, 06:46 PM
what the hell is outlaw 632?
BACARTY
04-14-2009, 07:03 PM
what the hell is outlaw 632?
where only nitrous and n/a motors no larger then 632 compete.
trying to get away from the turbos/blowers and huge nitrous motors
if you have a 632 and nitrous you can run the 7.50 index like schroder, or slow down and run it all motor and run the 8.50
Honk if parts fall off
04-14-2009, 09:50 PM
That sounds uninteresting... Why not run Top Sportsman? Can't see outlaw 632 working up this way, 10.5 and drag radial has way more appeal. .02
another69camaro
04-15-2009, 06:50 AM
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee343/joker4479/EventFlyer002.jpg
another69camaro
04-15-2009, 07:00 AM
i cant run 8.50 with a tube car or any other heads up class around here.and no way a 3150lb conventional head car is gonna compete in top sportsman.guess this outlaw 632 looks real good to me because its about the only class my car would fit into well besides just running super et and this seems like way more fun heads up style.
Honk if parts fall off
04-15-2009, 10:54 PM
so you want a class built around your car.... me, you and everyone else ...
But if you don't think you have a chance in top sportsman, what makes you think you'd have a chance in "outlaw 632"? i'm not trying to pick on you, just asking exactly what a track operator would probably say...
guess my point is, don't build a class for a car, build a car for a class.
another69camaro
04-16-2009, 07:00 AM
632 is a class,just wish they ran it around here thats about it.they are not running top sportsman times in that class as the min weight is much higher and the ci is limited.
jchamp
04-18-2009, 05:57 PM
Let's do a 91mm single turbo smallblock outlaw class, that's what we need.
so you want a class built around your car.... me, you and everyone else ...
But if you don't think you have a chance in top sportsman, what makes you think you'd have a chance in "outlaw 632"? i'm not trying to pick on you, just asking exactly what a track operator would probably say...
guess my point is, don't build a class for a car, build a car for a class.
another69camaro
04-18-2009, 09:53 PM
jc chump .GO FUCK YOUR MOTHER ASSHOLE.........
598nos
04-19-2009, 09:14 PM
WOW......is his mother a MILTF? HitIt:-::smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082 :smt082
632 outlaw is growing down in florida. also gets other cars that the chassis didnt meet the new rules from 8.50 to 7.50 up dates come back out because it only 1/8 mile.
I would do her............i mean it (sorry) ...........definetly :smt066
jchamp
04-26-2009, 01:21 AM
Jc chump, chimp, whatever I still love you but your just a little too serious/sensitive. Just for the mother thing there will be no chevy's allowed. Good luck w/ your 632" Jimmy
jc chump .GO FUCK YOUR MOTHER ASSHOLE.........
another69camaro
04-26-2009, 06:38 AM
yeah that was a little harsh i apoligize.
jchamp
04-27-2009, 06:35 PM
Harsh, She was in tears!
yeah that was a little harsh i apoligize.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.